Research · Academia · Systematic Review · Evidence-based Practice

The gap your
literature review
cannot find alone

Every field has blind spots — concepts the literature systematically ignores, dimensions that never appear in abstracts, innovations waiting to be named. Lacuna Scope makes them visible.

Used by PhD researchers, systematic reviewers, think tanks, science journalists and research institutes — anyone who needs to know not just what the literature says, but what it doesn't. Results are reproducible by any peer reviewer.

Same corpus · same parameters · same result — always
We do not train models on your documents
Zero retention — analysis runs in your browser
Cited in Springer Nature Systematic Reviews 2026
Start free — 20 documents ↗ See features

Free trial · No credit card required

Gap Analysis · 24 papers · cybersecurity
security
88%
privacy
72%
encryption
61%
cognition
human factor
behaviour
⚠ Human and cognitive dimensions absent from 91% of papers — publication opportunity identified
Why deterministic matters for research

Your methodology must be
reproducible. Your tool must be too.

"Lacuna identified as one of 388 analytical tools globally for evidence synthesis — distinguished by its deterministic, zero-retention architecture."

Sousa et al. — Systematic Reviews, Springer Nature, 2026
AI-based analysis tools
Results vary between sessions — same corpus, different output
Probabilistic models cannot be audited by peer reviewers
Your documents may be used to train the model
Algorithm is proprietary — methodology cannot be reproduced
Lacuna Scope
Deterministic — same corpus, same parameters, same result. Always.
Every score traceable to source — fully auditable
We do not train models on your data. Ever.
Algorithm is transparent — methodology fully documentable
What Lacuna Scope includes
Heat Map

Which papers in your corpus actually focus on your topic — and which only mention it in passing? The Heat Map shows every term's presence across every document, separating central treatment from peripheral citation.

Gap Analysis

Which concepts appear in your field but are underexplored in your corpus? Gap Analysis ranks terms by how few documents cover them — turning an absence into a researchable opportunity.

Pulse — Research

Is your topic still open, or is the field already converging? Pulse Research shows publication growth year by year — so you can see whether the contribution window is widening or closing before you commit.

👤
Author Intelligence

Who are the central voices in your topic? Find the most cited authors, explore their output, and map the intellectual lineage of your field — from a name or ORCID to a full scholarly profile.

Consensus vs Controversy

Is a term settled or still debated? Contested terms — those where documents disagree — are your most productive research territory. Lacuna surfaces the fights the field is still having.

AI Advisor

Ask your corpus a question in plain language and get an answer grounded in your documents — not in a model's training data. Bring your own API key; your documents and queries never leave your browser.

Who uses Lacuna Scope

One question drives it all:
what is the field not saying?

Lacuna Scope is built for anyone whose work depends on understanding a body of literature — not just what it contains, but what it systematically avoids.

🎓
PhD researchers

Is your contribution original — or has it already been made? Load your reading list and find the concepts your field treats, ignores, and debates. Defend your gap with a reproducible methodology any examiner can verify.

📋
Systematic reviewers

Which population subgroups are absent from the evidence base? Which interventions are understudied? Gap Analysis surfaces the structural absences that narrative review misses — with output citable as a methodological annex.

🏛
Think tanks & policy institutes

Which concepts appear in the academic literature but are absent from policy documents — or vice versa? Compare corpora from different sources and surface the translation gaps between research and policy.

📰
Science journalists

What is the research community focusing on that hasn't reached mainstream coverage yet? Load recent publications and find the emerging concepts that make a story original — before your competitors do.

🔬
Research institutes

Before investing in a new research line, map what the field has already produced. Pulse Research shows whether the contribution window is still open — or whether the field is already converging toward saturation.

Evidence-based practice

Which clinical guidelines, legal precedents, or professional standards lack an evidence base? Load your corpus and find where practice has outrun research — or where research has not yet reached practice.

Pricing

Simple, transparent.
No surprises at renewal.

Lacuna Scope
£14.99
per user / month · cancel anytime
100 documents per analysis · 200 terms · 3 corpus comparison
  • All analysis views — Heat Map, Gap, Bridge, Bubbles, Timeline, Clusters
  • Pulse Editorial · Pulse Research · AI Advisor
  • Consensus vs Controversy · Co-occurrence · Geo Gaps · Polarity
  • Export CSV, HTML, PNG · Email support
  • Zero retention — all analysis runs in your browser
Start free trial — 20 documents

No credit card required

Need 500 documents, Patents, News monitoring or Trend Discovery? See Lacuna Signal →

Start finding gaps your
literature review missed

Drop your PDFs. The engine runs in your browser. Your documents never leave your device.

Try Lacuna Scope free →